From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] October 2007
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I'm sorry if I overstepped but why was I blocked for 48 hours? And Taharqa violated the 3R rule, as he kept undoing all of my contributions. He has done this to maintain his ownership of the articles. 203.109.33.35 06:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "I'm declining the request due to the fact that you did violate 3RR, and as well, you were asked to stop adding to Taharqa's page. However I am willing to unblock you if you are willing to discuss with Taharqa to reach consensus on whatever articles you two are working on. — nattang 06:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
 Y |
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
IP is willing to discuss consensus with Taharqa.
Request handled by: nattang 07:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Thank you. 203.109.33.35 07:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me, but this, this, this, and this does not help and you are seriously treading a very thin line. Please discuss without being so uncivil and laying down/assigning the blame or I will be forced to take action. nattang 07:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Sorry, but the actions you took after I unblocked you was pretty much the same thing before I blocked you the first time. So I'm reblocking you. nattang 07:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I am sorry to say that you appear to be partial to Taharqa even though he is insulting me and engaged in revert warring. I request review by a more impartial wikipedia administrator. Please do not show favortism, he did not even get a warning like me. This is against the spirit of wikipedia. 203.109.33.35 08:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "I uphold this block. User:Nat has been forgiving once, and you have abused that forgivness. This block is preventative not punitive. — Pedro : Chat 08:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
- So it's OK to give out warning to one party only? Is this how Wikipedia works? It takes two as you know. 203.109.33.35 08:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.
[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]
|
