User talk:202.164.46.232

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Euthanasia, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sebi [talk] 07:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Database management system. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 06:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Indo-Pakistani relations, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Indo-Pakistani relations was changed by 202.164.46.232 (c) (t) deleting 7865 characters on 2007-11-14T12:05:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 12:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of DOS commands. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gary King (talk) 07:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Value of information has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma msg Review 06:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Value of information constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. MBisanz talk 06:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Value of information. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Enigma msg Review 06:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Value of information. MBisanz talk 06:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Dreadstar † 06:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Peer-to-peer. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - 83.254.215.235 (talk) 10:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Post Office Protocol has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 04:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Post Office Protocol constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Loren.wilton (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC))


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Decision support system, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Decision support system was changed by 202.164.46.232 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-25T08:43:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)