User talk:200.90.143.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your opinion may have merit, but your edits at Cultura Profética are considered vandalism. Try to be more constructive. - Draeco 23:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


Welcome!

Hello, 200.90.143.2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! WilyD 21:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cultura Profética, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 20:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kuna Yala. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Shoessss 19:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Kuna Yala

Hello.

If you think the edits are unconstructive, you are wrong.

I am Panamanian and have been there several times and know the history, facts, etc better than you.

I will make the changes back.

If you don't believe me, contact a native Kuna and you will see they are correct.

I am sorry User:200.90.143.2, but your edits are extremely “Point of View”. In addition, you have not cited any reference or reliable sources stating the allegations you have made. If you can provide this material, I am more than happy to concur with you and include the information. However, without, I am sorry, it does not belong in the article. If you need any help in structuring the information in a more palatable manner, please let me know and I would be more than happy in giving you a hand. Hope this helps. ShoesssS Talk 00:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)~


[edit] Americas

The English word continent refers to one of the seven large chunks of land that form more or less discrete pieces (although this is dubious in the Europe/Asia case, obviously). While similar words may have different meanings, the above is a well established fact, and can be sourced to anywhere you like. I have a dictionary that defines the word continent by listing all seven. The definitions are historical anyways,and not very exciting, but here at Wikipedia we strive to report verifiable facts from reliable sources. So my opinion or your opinion on what should constitute a continent isn't relevant - we can only reproduce what reliable sources tell us, that the Americas are comprised of two continents, North America and South America. Cheers, WilyD 20:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

  • I'm not an American, you can guess again. The short answer is this: Find a very reliable source that lists Central America as a continent - or give up your quest to insert your own viewpoint into Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and not an appropriate place for you to be publishing private opinions. While any fool with a map might easily conclude that Europe and Asia are secretly on the same continent, we here at Wikipedia aim to provide neutral, verifiable information - including that the Earth has seven continents. Cheers, WilyD 20:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Any atlas can confirm that Central America is part of North America. That América del Norte does not include América Central is not germane to the discussion. WilyD 20:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • It's quite ironic that someone complaining about Central America being part of North America would failure to distinguish between Canada and America. It may come as a surprise to you that Central America is part of North America --- but I think you'll find you can't find any atlases that say otherwise. Feel free to try. Cheers, WilyD 23:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


Your recent contribution to your talk page has been reverted or removed. Although this is your talk page, making such edits are considered vandalism and will be reverted. If you continue, this talk page may be locked. Thank you. Cheers, JetLover 21:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Who the hell I think I am? I'm JetLover. And you can't remove content form your talk page, m'kay? Cheers, JetLover 21:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

You see, your talk page serves as a record to show what you have done in the past. And I do not have pictures of "shitty" jets on my page if you have looked. Cheers, JetLover 21:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Americas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Deor 21:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk: Deor, you will be blocked from editing. And I'm an expert at tracking down sockpuppets. Cheers, JetLover 21:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kuna Yala

Please source your edits. The onus is on you as the individual adding the information to provide a source. Simply using the edit summary of "THESE ARE THE MOST POPULAR ISLANDS VISITED (SEARCH GOOGLE AND SEE IT YOURSELF)" is not sufficient. See our policy on verifiability and our guideline on reliable sources--Isotope23 13:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Please take some time to familiarize yourself with the verifiability policy. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, but those edits need to be verfiable by reliable sources, otherwise they are subject to removal.--Isotope23 14:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I also want to point out our policies on personal attacks and civility. Anymore edits like this and you will likely be blocked from editing.--Isotope23 14:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nobody Likes Me

Apparently nobody likes me. Too bad.

It's not a question of like or dislike. Try editing constructively by adding content with sources and not attacking your fellow editors.--Isotope23 16:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] To my friends WilyD, Shoesss, JetLover, and Isotope32

I love you guys. When are we gonna get a beer together?

No response... I am going to kill myself.

Good bye.

User:200.90.143.2 To be honest, I would not mind having a beer or two with you. Name the place and time and let us see if we can get together. I will even pick-up the first round. Have a great day. ShoesssS Talk