Talk:1995 Atlantic hurricane season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hurricanes
 This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

Contents

[edit] Images of each storm

Another year, another set of images.

Will finish later. Too many to do. Hurricanehink 01:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Added Pablo. Hurricanehink 00:46, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Added Noel. And now I have to go. Ugh, if I could only finish now... Hurricanehink 15:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Almost done. Hurricanehink 17:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Done... finally. Hurricanehink 22:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Todo

Content is fairly complete, but the article is lacking sources, wording is poor in some places, and the pictures haven't been added yet. Jdorje 08:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ACE Table

ACE (104 kt2) – Storm
1 53.9 Luis 2 29.3 Felix 3 22.67 Iris
4 22.51 Humberto 5 21.5 Marilyn 6 16.2 Roxanne
8 11.06 Opal 9 8.73 Tanya 10 7.32 Erin
11 6.53 Chantal 12 3.42 Karen 13 3.16 Barry
14 3.08 Allison 15 2.45 Pablo 16 2.12 Sebastien
17 1.39 Gabrielle 18 .612 Jerry 19 .282 Dean

[edit] Tanya

The tanya section makes little sense. There's argument about whether the storm was a Category 1 or a Category 3 hurricane when it hit "the island". What island? The only land affected was the Azores islands, while Tanya was extratropical and had gale-force winds. — jdorje (talk) 06:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

The Category 3 statement has no sources. The unofficial reading part was a good idea, but I think it should be removed. Hurricanehink 13:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Small infoboxes for page

1995 is the 3rd most active season in history with many notable storms.Dont you think this page deserves a set of small infoboxes?HurricaneCraze32 23:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Do you mean actual infoboxes or small infoboxes used in 2004 and 2005? Hurricanehink 19:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
The Small ones and thats 2002-2005.HurricaneCraze32 20:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
OK. That's not a bad idea. Hurricanehink 01:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
It does well-when i get home from my dad's company i can start.If everyone agrees that is..I made Allison as an example.HurricaneCraze32 01:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I thought we agreed we were going to use a table format for season statistics, rather than the infobox format? — jdorje (talk) 06:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
The results of the discussion was rather ambiguous, so it could go either way. I personally like the table format, so when you finish the templates, someone could tablize everything. Hurricanehink 00:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Article links-i have an easier way-to save space-link the titles.HurricaneCraze32 23:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unneeded table

I removed the following table from the article. I'm not sure of its purpose, so I'll just put it here for now. It's merely a table of the most active seasons, which can easily be said in words. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Tropical
storms		 Year Hurricanes
Total Major
28 2005 15 7
21 1933 10 5
19 1995 11 5
1887 11 2
18 1969 12 5

[edit] Possible storm

According to Jack Beven's summaries there was a possible (sub)tropical storm with approximate peak winds of 45kts located to the S of Nova Scotia and E of Virginia - visible in this GIBBS image.--Nilfanion (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Cool, but can we ut in it? →Cyclone1→ 23:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Ut in it? Do you mean put IT in?Mitchazenia(8600+edits) 00:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
If you can source it, sure, you could put it in an other storms section. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Give me some time and I'll get Jack Beven's info out...--Nilfanion (talk) 11:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What's next?

Here's a good site regarding why the season was so active. Some of that should probably be added. Looking at the article as a whole, we might be able to do a redo of 2005. Yes, I am talking about having articles for all storms and having a season summary, not a list of storms. I don't know, maybe I'm foolish and shouldn't even think of it, but it could potentially work. Thoughts? Hurricanehink (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Right now, this is the season I am most heavily targetting for new articles. I don't think the 2005 format should be used; it should be modelled after 2003 and 2004 as they were not a whole lot less active; 2005 was "off the charts" and deserves special treatment. CrazyC83 02:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)