User talk:198.184.0.252

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] "Save Surface" edits to NBC

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page NBC have been removed. Please do not add links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. (The links in question do not belong on the NBC article anyway, as you had been warned in an edit summary before.) See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Gayatri:

Your recent edit to Gayatri (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 23:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gayatri. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Into The Fray T/C 23:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Biman Bangladesh Airlines

Hi, could you please explain this edit. Your change introduces an extra character which does not render correctly in Firefox or IE and breaks the interwiki link. Would be useful if you could explain it. Cheers. → AA (talk) — 16:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:John Hancock has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calabraxthis (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)