User talk:198.111.167.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 198.111.167.130, is registered to Novi Public Library, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 19:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 20:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] POV edits and "Weasel Words"

Hi. A concern about your edits was raised on the Comics Wikipedia Project page. Looking over some of them, I think the concerns may be valid. Please don't foget that on Wikipedia, the use of "weasel words" (examples: WP:WEASEL) is discouraged. Also, if you feel that fans' specific opinions or criticisms are worth noting in the article, please provide references. If you have any questions or concerns, I'd be happy to help you out. dfg 21:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Gwen Stacy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 19:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gwen Stacy

Please stop adding your POV statements to the Gwen Stacy article...such as repeatedly adding that its "highly" controversial, or adding "attempts to" the fitting Sins Past article in an attempt to undermine its validity. Thank you. :)--CyberGhostface 20:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Regarding edits made during June 5, 2006 (UTC) to Apple iPod silhouette commercials

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Bachrach44 20:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to France. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Saint Petersburg, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. abakharev 02:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page November 21 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 19:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Balhae (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brandon Novak, you will be blocked from editing. —Ocatecir Talk 18:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Brandon Novak (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Deiz talk 15:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)