User talk:195.16.32.66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edit to ligand

I see you added a link to an external website to ligand. I have reverted that edit, it looks to me as linkspam. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Dear 195.16.32.66,
You may disagree, but I still believe it is linkspam: it is the only link to an external, commercial site. That is the reason why I revert (and will again). To this I add, first of all, you use an anonymous account, from an IP (which look suspicious, we don't know you are, and you may not be you again tomorrow, if you know what I mean), second, you could be paid to put the links into the wikipedia (working for the company), third, you don't add info, you only add a link (hence, linkspam), and fourth, it is in the wrong type of section, the see also section is used for internal links (links to wikipedia), it should have been in an external link section (so that the readers know it is an external link).
As a solution, you could write a section about the use of computational methods in ligand choice, e.g. describing why calculation is important and how it is done. A link to the Wikipedia page of the company would then be normal, and preferably, try to be unbiased and link also to comparable pages (even if your program is the best, Wikipedia is not a medium for advertisements, let the reader decide, not the writer). On the company page, the link is not a spam-link, it would genuinly be an external link.
Kind regards, Dirk Beetstra T C 21:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
P.S., could you next time sign using ~~~~? Thanks --Dirk Beetstra T C 21:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)