User talk:195.101.63.39

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is a confirmed sock puppet of Firstwind, as established by CheckUser.
Please refer to this checkuser request page for further information.
Account information: contribs — page moves — all logs — block log — sock master userpage.


[edit] Regarding edits to Broken Sword

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 195.101.63.39! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bfreewebs\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 13:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:Firstwind has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 15:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:Firstwind has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ——Ryan | t • c 14:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:195.101.63.39, you will be blocked from editing. Schcamboaon scéal? 14:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

The recent edit you made to Nantes constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 13:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Hi i'm requesting to be unblocked, as i don't consider my actions as vandalism. My last edit on Tramway de Nantes was about the spelling format of the article"

Decline reason: "WP:DUCK test. Obvious reincarnation of banned editor. If you wish to request unblock, please do so at your screenname. — The Evil Spartan (talk) 14:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.