User talk:194.144.90.118

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Bobby Fischer

I think I understand your concern over the question of who Bobby Fischer's father was, but the evidence is rather strong that it was Paul Nemenyi. This is discussed a bit in the Bobby Fischer#Early years section. It appears that the FBI thought that Nemenyi was his father (they had a file on Regina) for the reasons described in that section. The best analysis I have seen in print is in Bobby Fischer Goes To War. Quale (talk) 06:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

The evidence is alright and perhaps this theory is correct but it's not proven and it's only a theory, it is extremely strange that this wikipedia article is taking sides on that and I will not allow it. This theory is discussed sufficiently elsewhere in the article without the likely remark.

  • You don't get to make that decision ("I will not allow it") on your own. My impression is that most editors of the article disagree with your opinion on this, so unless you are able to convince them, it will stay. I appreciate the attempt that you made on the Talk page to engage others on this and it's too bad that you didn't get any responses. (I think sometimes anonymous editors aren't accorded as much attention on these sorts of matters.) I suggest you try the Talk page again if you want the article to be changed. Quale (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  • By the way, the theory is in no way "vague", as you describe it. Regina Fischer's FBI file is quite concrete about the details, and there is other evidence as well, including support payments Nemenyi made to Regina Fischer and the word of Nemenyi's son. Quale (talk) 14:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Alleged support payments and the alleged word of Nemenyi's son, I don't hear anybody and I don't see any receipts.

Honestly it looks to me like most of them don't care one bit. And I don't see why anyone would want that line there after all the opinion it contains is just a guess, who knows maybe his mom slept with the pizzadelivery boy. I question your motives for wanting that line there. I for one would be pleased if this matter was proven one way or the other but there exists no prove. There exists an alternative to the two options we have used so far, perhaps I'll take it.

You have at least three editors who oppose your Bobby Fischer edits. Why is it that you are ignoring the wishes of multiple other editors? Just to clarify (talk) 23:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Asked and answered son. Looks to me as if this is something that you should not be involved in.

Guess what, buddy. This is an encyclopedia where we try to come up with consensus, not an encyclopedia where only you get to edit pages. So, learn to work with the rest of us. Just to clarify (talk) 14:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

It looks to me as if that advice applies better to you than it does to me.