User talk:194.129.67.171

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good Add with the Norman and the Worms thing! ;) --Ira-welkin 21:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Excellent additions! Thanks alot! --Ira-welkin 22:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

I made a slight change to your last change to Depeche Mode. Hope you like it/agree with it. Thanks.

Contents

[edit] 30 January 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Vodka on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 10:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 31 January 2007

Concerning the article Williamsburg, Brooklyn, per the manual of style concerning spelling it's not appropriate to change the spelling of a word such as neighbourhood to the USAmerican style when the article is about a specifically USAmerican topic. Thanks for your contributions and edits. Have fun editing here. MKoltnow 21:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 5 February 2007

There is no need to change the spelling and such in the talk pages. Please leave them be. If you wish to talk about this issue, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Human historian 01:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Everton F.C. page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Gareth Hughes 15:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cragganmore. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  superβεεcat  03:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] October 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Depeche Mode. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --John 02:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Leon Jackson (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 12:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to December 30, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Justin talk 20:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)