User talk:192.42.92.28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 192.42.92.28, is registered to Alachua County Library Disrict, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Good faith

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Broly, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Also, make sure to use an informative edit summary for such edits. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. --3bulletproof16 18:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] General note

Thank you for experimenting with the page Broly on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --3bulletproof16 19:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Caution

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Broly. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --3bulletproof16 20:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Broly, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --3bulletproof16 21:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Duck. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kyle G 20:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Alligator. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kariteh 20:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dante Hicks, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Branson03 19:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Traffic light (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to The Game (Harvard-Yale) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Lazulilasher (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC))

Your recent edit to Honda (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Collaborative writing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.   jj137 (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Talk:AIDS constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks.   jj137 (talk) 21:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC))

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ku Klux Klan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ku Klux Klan, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. JaGa (talk) 22:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Lil Wayne discography has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 20:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hamlet, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ashton1983 (talk) 21:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)