User talk:192.149.109.218
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This message is regarding the page Cohoctah Township, Michigan. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 08:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Dec. 17, 2006
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hamster Sandwich 02:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] March 2006
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Petros471 20:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Norwich University
Please stop vandalizing this entry. Longshot14 21:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create an account. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.
If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future punishments such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own.
Waggers 15:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
I find it ABSURD that my contribution is considered 'vandalizing.'
Is anything I wrote incorrect?
This all presumes, of course, that the population under scrutiny meets all of Haldane's criteria and contraints, which real populations rarely do. The 'dilemma' aspect, emphasized by creationists, such as electrical engineer Walter ReMine, also assumes that a large number of beneficial mutations are required to produce what could be relatively minor phenotypic changes. For example, in the question of human evolution from an ape-like ancestor, it seems obvious that relatively few large-scale changes would be 'required' to evolve Homo from a non-Homo ancestor, since the obvious phenotypic differences between humans and our closest living relatives, chimpanzees - which evidence indicates also evolved from the same ancestral species - are of degree and not kind. Thus, the production of a 'new gene(s)' would not be required as many seem to think, and even among the changes that did occur, all need not have been 'beneficial', which means an application of Haldane's model for those changes is inappropriate. Generally speaking, the use of 'Haldane's dilemma' as some sort of problem for evolution - even to implicate evolutionary biologists as being part of some sort of cover-up - is disingenuous and unwarranted when one looks at the real issues.
If so, please point it out.
What part of it is not 'constructive', and who took it upon themselves to decide?
My edit puts the issue into perspective, and points out how the 'dilemma' is not a dilemma at all in terms of understanding the processes involved.
Please explain to me why this is considered 'vandalism.'
Otherwise, please stop misrepresenting my edit.
Scott L. Page, PhD. spage@norwich.edu
[edit] September 2006
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Bernards High School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alansohn 04:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Laura Branigan (album)
Your recent edit to Laura Branigan (album) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to FA Premier League, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --theProject 23:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Popular revolt in late medieval Europe
Your recent edit to Popular revolt in late medieval Europe (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Kosovo Force, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Corpx 16:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kosovo Force
This IP address was recently used to vandalize the Wikipedia article Palko v. Connecticut. If vandalism continues from this address it will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
If this IP address is shared between multiple users, then your edits may be unrelated to this vandalism. To avoid being included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans, we invite you to create a user account of your own. Sander123 14:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. alphachimp 16:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Recent edits
I don't think anyone has called the most recent edits from this IP to be vandalism (if you notice, the IP is used by multiple people, so not all the messages will go to the intended individual). The main issue with your addition is that it seems to be original research which Wikipedia does not do. If you have reliable sources for the statemeents then it might be included. JoshuaZ 17:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding edits made during February 4, 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Lindmere 04:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Warren G. Harding, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Corpx 15:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] February 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Jessica. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SparrowsWing (talk) 20:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning
[edit] March 2007
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Eighty Years' War page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. CaptainVindaloo t c e 11:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Air Force Space Command. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NSR77 (Talk|Contribs) 20:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] April 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Steven Seagal, you will be blocked from editing. Leafyplant 17:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Steven Seagal, you will be blocked from editing. Leafyplant 17:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning
[edit] Your edit to Steven Seagal
Your recent edit to Steven Seagal (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Red Jumpsuit Apparatus, you will be blocked from editing. --LifeStar 14:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to George Marshall, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Airbus, you will be blocked from editing. --Guinnog 18:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Risk (game).
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. · AndonicO Talk 00:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Ken Ham (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 03:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
| | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |


