User talk:192.100.124.218

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 192.100.124.218, is registered to esprx01x.nokia.com, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
See also: User talk:192.100.124.219

Contents

[edit] Farnborough

I'm sorry to hear about your unfortunate experiences with Farnborough. But you don't know real hardship until you've lived next-door to Braintree for twenty-something years... ;) You might want to consider reading Wikipedia:Neutral point of view before contributing any further... Okay, it's a bit of a dull read, and to be honest I haven't read it all myself, but that's our policy. I hope you stick around and make some more interesting (but more neutral) articles. :) -- Oliver P. 12:40 28 May 2003 (UTC)

[edit] Copyvios

Please note that copy-pasting text to Wikipedia from elsewhere in the web is generally not allowed. (Kultaranta & [1]) Try to write original text instead. --Jonik 15:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing anonymously. You can continue to do so. You are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and write articles, but doing so will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 192.100.124.218). There are many benefits for logging in to Wikipedia.

Please note these points:

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

from Wikipedian: Hall Monitor 17:45, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to Katie Melua

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 18:08, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Business class

You recently added several paragraphs to Business class. Did you write these yourself? We need to know if this is text copied from some other source. ike9898 22:45, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scandinavia, Coffee

Please stop making your repeated controversial edit to Scandinavia without discussing this on the article's talk page, and please stop making your unreferenced edit to Coffee. If you have a reliable source for this, please cite it. Thank you. CLW 11:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

You've been asked politely not to keep making these edits, and I've explained the reasons. The fact that you continue to do so without explaining why at the articles' talk pages and without explaining your reasoning in your edit summaries suggests that this is vandalism. Please therefore be warned that if you continue to do so, you are liable to be blocked from editing. CLW 11:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Islamophobia

Please read WP:NOR and WP:WEASEL. We cannot say "Some people say Islamophobia is caused by ..." it looks like just your opinion that is contradicts the "No Original Research" principle. If you would find somebody prominent stating this argument, then it is OK to write: "XX argued that Islamophobia ...". So if the idea is dear to you please go and seek for a citation Alex Bakharev 15:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] recent edits

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies on sourcing, original research, and weasel words before contributing more material of the kind you added to articles like anti-intellectualism. You can't just dress up personal opinions under the guise of "some say..." and expect it to improve an encyclopedia article. -- Rbellin|Talk 18:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to social construction, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. -- Rbellin|Talk 18:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not replace text with or add biased text to Wikipedia. This violates WP:NPOV, a rule of wikipedia. I suggest you contribute to an article that you do not feel as strong about, as this will give you some experience in editing wikipedia. When you feel you can edit articles you feel strongly about without bias, you are welcome to do so. Regards, Omega ArchdoomTalk 09:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Ogaden. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ogaden with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Ogaden with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Ogaden saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 12:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to SIGARMS, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 10:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Guy's page

A tag has been placed on Template:Guy's page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)