User talk:166.61.194.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cathy O'Brien, you will be blocked from editing. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Joe Scarborough, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. - Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 21:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


An important message

This notice has been left for you because another Wikipedia user suspects that, perhaps inadvertently, you may have defamed someone in your contributions. Please recheck your edits. Do not make allegations against someone unless you have provided evidence from a reliable publication, and then make sure you describe the allegations in accordance with our content policies, particularly Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Don't rely on hearsay, rumours, or things you believe without evidence to be facts, and don't use sources to create a novel narrative. Wikipedia requires reliable sources for all claims. Please see our policy on biographies of living persons.

If you may have inadvertently defamed someone in an article, do two things:

  1. If the material is still there, remove it immediately. You may wish to use an edit summary like "Removing possible defamation" to prevent it from being reverted.
  2. Leave a note on the administrator's noticeboard saying that you have accidentally included defamatory claims in a named article or articles. Do not repeat the claim(s). The revision(s) containing the material can then be deleted from the page history.

Pascal.Tesson 21:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, as you did to User talk:Jossi, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 22:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

— Scientizzle 22:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse was changed by 166.61.194.2 (c) (t) replacing content with '9/11 is a big fucking lie!' on 2007-08-20T11:18:30+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 15:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 fortnight in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--ST47Talk·Desk 15:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Your recent edit to Restoration of the Sistine Chapel frescoes (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 14:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)