User talk:164.167.34.67

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.pngAttention:

This IP address, 164.167.34.67, is registered to Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, US Naval Hospital, Portsmouth, VA and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, US Naval Hospital, Portsmouth, VA to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to vandalism. Further acts of vandalism from this IP may result in another immediate block without warning.
[ contribs • block • block log]

Why did you try to remove "making them the only enlisted personnel in the U.S. military authorized to carry a sword" from the USMC article? --Kenyon 22:39, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

-Because Navy Chief Petty Officers are also authorized to carry a sword (cutlass).

Sorry, this discussion has come up before; CPOs are only allowed to carry the cutlass when dressed in period uniform while serving aboard the USS Constitution. This is not an authorized modern uniform, it is a special dispensation for historical display purposes.
Fox1 11:45, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

-I stand corrected.

Hello, I reverted you but I can see your cleaning up the article. My bad. - RoyBoy 800 18:13, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Hall Monitor 19:08, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] December 6

RE: [1] Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Hall Monitor 19:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

RE: [2] Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hall Monitor 19:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Regarding the page Wesley Baker: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bmdavll talk 19:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Wikibofh 20:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

~~I have NEVER vandalised an article on Wikipedia. Anything I edit is solely to clean up bad grammar or spelling.164.167.34.67 16:54, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

  • You may not have, but others using this IP have. If you register for an account, you won't get painted with the same broad brush. Wikibofh(talk) 17:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Diamond cutting page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee 16:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page The 7 Day Theory on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Bencherlite 12:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Tom Becka, you will be blocked from editing. Ashdog137 (talk) 17:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. STORMTRACKER 94 15:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Please do not vandalise Wikipedia. It does not reflect well upon your institution. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Biochemical cascade, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Biochemical cascade was changed by 164.167.34.67 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-11T04:12:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Psilocybin mushrooms (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 13:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Domestic violence has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 19:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)