User talk:163.11.83.15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 163.11.83.15, is registered to Cedarville College and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Attention:

This IP address, 163.11.83.15, is registered to Cedarville University and may be shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. Attempts to vandalize using this address will be reported to Cedarville University as network abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.


Your test worked. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from posting. This is your warning. Moncrief 20:24, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to The Robert Johnson Songbook (album), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Misza13 T C 19:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Your edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tennis Golf

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tennis Golf (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Your edit to Cedarville University

This IP address was recently used to vandalize the Wikipedia article Cedarville_University. If vandalism continues from this address it will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If this IP address is shared between multiple users, then your edits may be unrelated to this vandalism. To avoid being included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans, we invite you to create a user account of your own. --WikkiTikkiTavi 02:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edit to The Breakfast Club

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article The Breakfast Club are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Vic226(chat) 18:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Bobby Carpenter (American football) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Mønobi 03:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)