User talk:161.185.1.100

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 161.185.1.100, is registered to City of New York, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Your creation of Cowboy Zen is a copyright violation, but since you appear to have an interest in the subject, you could rewrite the article in your own words. If you don't, the article will be removed. If you want help editing the article, leave me a note on my talk page. Thanks! -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 19:42, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Canal Street

On User:SPUI/NYCS crossovers you marked Canal Street on the IND Eighth Avenue Line as (from south end only). What do you mean by this? Can only passengers in the southernmost cars use the crossover, or do those in northern cars simply have to walk farther? --SPUI (talk) 21:12, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Test

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Mike Garcia | talk 23:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 14:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Issac

Please log in. I've responded to your post on my talk page. JFW | T@lk 17:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding link-spamming

I've reverted your edit to Software agent as it appeared to be link-spamming. Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you think I was wrong in reverting this edit, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks, TheJC TalkContributions 19:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to July 11, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 17:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to June 2, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 18:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Portal:Current events/More events on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Extraordinary Machine 21:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Rondout Reservoir. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Daniel Case 19:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rondout Reservoir

Thanks for the work and background on the Record story. Very interesting. Having worked in journalism myself I am all too familiar with editors who have agendas. That really struck me as a foolish thing for a media spokesperson to say, and on further thought I will probably take it out of the article soon.

Unfortunately, unless DEP were to put something like that out in a press release, or somewhere on its website, we can't use it as a source (I presume you work for them ... you could always try to make that happen). In the meantime I'll put it on the article's talk page.

As for using newspaper articles as sources, as we often say here, as a tertiary source we merely reflect what has been reported elsewhere. Sometimes you have nothing else but newspaper articles (Try writing about a current event or breaking news story without them, especially since they're online). Historians use them all the time.

Take a look at one of my personal favorites among articles I've worked on, The Miracle at the Meadowlands. That's a sports-related story, and even though I haven't put the footnotes in the level of detail I have in there, the ways in which you see that that play wasn't as much Joe Pisarcik's fault as some people believe today, would have been impossible without going into all those old newspaper articles on microfilm.

Yes, news stories can be unreliable (as a coworker of mine was fond of quoting William Randolph Hearst, journalism is the first draft of history). The idea is that over time other sources will emerge to allow for a broader perspective. Daniel Case 18:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page NYC Media Group on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheRanger 21:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mala, Kerala, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 18:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Calling All Social Workers!

You have shown an interest in the Social Work article. If you are a social worker, you may consider adding youself to the Wikipedians with MSW degrees or Wikipedian Social Workers categories. I am trying to get more people in this field, interested in working on the social work related Wikipedia articles. If you have any questions, just post a note on my talk page. Ursasapien 05:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Social Work

I notice you have contributed to the discussion of the article Social work. I have created a new WikiProject, WikiProject Social Work. I have begun to work on this project and I would love to have your help. Please take a look at it and consider joining the project. Many thanks, Ursasapien (talk) 05:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Your recent edit to Windward and leeward (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. Please note you are using a sharing IP address, so registering will allow you to differentiate your work from others, and you won't be blocked if others vandalize wikipedia using your IP address. You'll also be able to:

   * Monitor changes to pages of interest with your own watchlist;
   * Create new pages;
   * Choose your own username, provided it is appropriate;
   * Customize the appearance and behavior of the website;
   * Edit semi-protected pages;
   * Upload images; and
   * Rename pages.

Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, remember to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~). St.isaac 18:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Mariano Rivera page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sciurinæ 13:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Late Orchestration, you will be blocked from editing. Wikidudeman (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


[edit] Notability of Sinfonieorchester Basel

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sinfonieorchester Basel, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sinfonieorchester Basel seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sinfonieorchester Basel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 15:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Eye Guess. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tags should not be removed from articles unless the issues they are pointing out have been addressed. Additionally, unsourced speculations and guesses are not appropriate Wikipedia content. Collectonian (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Eye Guess do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 16:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Biofeedback has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 13:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Amanda Burden, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rickey Henderson, you will be blocked from editing. User:calbear22 (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page What? Where? When? do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bucoz\.ru' (link(s): http://igame.ucoz.ru/) .
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 19:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Christianity, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wassupwestcoast (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Talk:Ne-Yo, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. – i123Pie biocontribs 15:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Image:Dime bank logo.gif has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Melvin Van Peebles. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kbdank71 15:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Jfahler. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ludwigs2 (talk) 19:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.