User talk:156.34.223.124

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Look

I know you mean well, but please stop changin both Rush and Sunn O))) when they have been fine in the line break format for months. You are starting an edit war. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 00:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't break featured articles. Ask the editors who made it into an FA what they think. 156.34.223.124 (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
There are plenty of featured articles with line breaks. Would you like me to list them? You know I will find them...and a lot of them. Now I know you are a better editor than me but I still must ask you to change those genre delimiters back per the armistice. It was put in place for a reason, man. And Rush has been a featured article for a long ass time and the last few months it had line breaks and no one cared. So, please, change the genre delimiters back or, if you want, I will make a gigantic list of featured articles with line breaks that will take me forever but prove a point. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 00:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Every FA is different. And articles are formatted differently for different projects. You should read a few WP:POL links. It would be a better benefit to your Wiki-time.

And how come I'm not on your cool list? I am the coolest editor Wikipedia has ever had. 156.34.223.124 (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Exactly, every article is different. This article has had line breaks for months and no one has cared. So will you please change it back to line breaks as we not only agree that it has been this way for months without anyone caring but that there is also the armistice to keep in mind. Please?

As for the "cool list" that thing (and my user page in general) is pretty inane. The reason those people are in that list, though, is because I had a written agreement (on wikipedia) with each of them, that was carefully worded, that said we would agree to help each other out when needed, if possible. It was a kind of "collaboration" so to speak. It does not break any wikipedia rules but I dare say you would not go into such an agreement with me. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 01:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Have I not helped you out with many tips and links to policies and guidelines to help you learn your Wiki-way. And I have even taken the time to defend your "good habits" on talk pages and prevented you from being blocked completely on a number of occasions. If you would just side-track your personal agendas and actually edit.... you'd probably turn into a respected editor and get your name off all of the blacklists. Other editors I know (ones you are also very familiar with) started out on the getting into some edit woes and then turned around and are now "near-admins" on Wikipedia. You're editing like a "metal" stereotype. Think "nerd" for a while and try editing. 156.34.223.124 (talk) 01:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Read your talk page!! Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 22:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Your normal one! Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 22:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Why I just undid deletion of external link to tribute to Danelectro founder Nathan Daniel

Hello. I just undid your deletion. I don't know why you deleted it, but perhaps you missed the explanation for why I put it there, an explanation that I placed on the article's talk page about 12 hours ago. Here it is:

This is Howard Daniel. I'm the (63-year old) son of Danelectro's founder, Nathan I. Daniel, who died in 1994. In the last few days, several other editors have made a variety of changes to this article, and several of those changes have included deleting an external link to a tribute I wrote about my father and first linked to this article in April 2007. The link remained undisturbed until roughly a week ago. The tribute to my father, which resides on my own Web site, is mainly about the many innovations that my dad contributed to the world of electric guitars and musical instrument amplifiers. The article provides a great deal of Danelectro history that can be found nowhere else. I think my tribute is a very useful addition to this article, and I respectfully request other editors out there to not once again delete this external link, which I am about to restore. I truly believe the tribute to Nathan I. Daniel constitutes an important service to anyone interested in Danelectro.

Just to make sure everything is as clear as possible, the tribute can be found at http://www.pen4rent.com/pen4rent/tribute.aspx, and if anyone is tempted in the future to again delete the link, I urge you, in my father's memory, to look the article over before deleting the link. If anyone wishes to contact me about this, please let me know by e-mail at howard@pen4rent.com.

Thank you very much. Howard E. Daniel 05:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Howard E. Daniel 05:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Howard E. Daniel 17:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)