User talk:152.131.10.133

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 152.131.10.133, is registered to United States Department of Veterans Affairs, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Plan of salvation. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Baseball,Baby! take a swing 19:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I would probably be better to talk about, or actually make the template less glaring, rather than just removing it from the pages. I'm going to go ahead and try to make it less glaring before I put them back on the articles. Umeboshi 02:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I can understand your point. I think that it would be more appropriate to fix the template to remove the researchers who are not sincere. Removing the template from Steve Jones page, who is sincere, rather than removing the disingenious researchers from the template reduces its value as a navigation aide. Umeboshi 03:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] template removal

You may find this of interest Fiddle Faddle 23:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] your remarks on the 911ct template talk page

I did not want to bring it up there, but I found your phraseology there bordering on incivil, especially the seemingly patronising tone with your remark "Not too difficult to understand, is it?". It is far easier and mor epleasant to work with someone than against them. Please consider how others will read your remarks and remember that we are all subject to community scrutiny. Fiddle Faddle 00:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop

Adding the 911 conspiracy theory template to Warren Commission and removing it from Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center is past the point of good-faith disagreement. Doing it once or twice is disrupting to make a point. Doing it repeatedly is vandalism. Please stop now. Tom Harrison Talk 01:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Content removal

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. Please use the talk page to work toward consensual changes. Thanks. RxS 04:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Light brown apple moth controversy do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://hacknflak.blogspot.com/2005/11/jeff-randle-has-bridge-he-will-sell.html) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 02:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

[edit] Welcome

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (152.131.10.133) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

From all the above template messages it looks like you may have gotten off to rough start here at WP, but this edit shows that you've come a long way and are learnin' the ropes. Kudos. Yilloslime (t) 02:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 9/11 conspiracy borderline vandalism

Please stop changing the titles of this article from [[1]] 'is a conspiracy 9/11 theory' to whatever you believe. If you don't agree with it, take up your concerns on the discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdynas (talk • contribs) 04:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The article David Icke now clarifies he believes in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Please do not remove him from the 911ct template, even though he's clearly a nut job.
The 9/11 RfAr specifies that you (Bov) can be banned from 9/11 articles at an uninvolved admin's discretion. Some of your edits have been helpful, and I'd hate to have you banned. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Go ahead and ban whomever else you like, that's not my concern. 01:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
OK, if you authorize me to ban you, even though I'm involved, you (and User:Bov) are banned from the templates {{911tm}} and {{911ct}}. If you edit either of them again, you will be blocked. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Since when does banning depend on whether a user authorizes someone to "ban" them? Show me the link please. 152.131.10.133 (talk) 01:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You disrupted the templates. A.R. is involved in editing the templates and in the dispute to a certain extent, and so could not simply ban you from the templates straight out. Your disruption on the pages concerned would then be resolved, and we won't have to pursue further remedies. John Nevard (talk) 02:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

3RR on Jim Hoffman, per a report at WP:AN3. This clearly violates your 1RR restriction on the 9/11 articles. This block also restricts Bov from editing until it expires. EdJohnston (talk) 23:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Violation of your 1RR/week restriction on the 9/11 articles, per a complaint at WP:AN3. None of the Bov accounts may edit Wikipedia until this block expires, except for your Talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 04:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)