User talk:151.200.237.167

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] September 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Highlander (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mike.lifeguard | talk 01:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Please read User:Arcayne's edit summaries previous to your first edit. All that content was previously removed with good reason:
  • m as per WP:FU; the images are decorative, and primary (meaning personal) sources descrbing the covers are not an adequate FU [Fair Use] argument, nor WP policy - see Disc
  • The citation is to the Amazon release of this DVD, and not a citable (comments aren't citable) source for the statements made)
  • rm statement - we cannot use blogs as citable references, as per WP:CITE and WP:ATT)
  • again, buyer comments are not acceptable sources of info in WP
  • citation doesn't reflect the statements made
  • correction. It has actually been released FIVE times, which included various outtakes and was part of a Highlander the series set)
Mike.lifeguard | talk 01:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Highlander (film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Please do not add the content in question again unless you've discussed it on the talk page first. It was removed with good reason, and shouldn't be added again. If you make the same edits again, I will ask to have you blocked. Discuss on the talk page with other contributors of the article. Mike.lifeguard | talk 01:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Frank

I assume you are FrankWilliams, based on your edits. Consensus is currently that the covers do not meet fair use criteria. Also, we cannot make personal observations and call that critical commentary, and "fan" opinion is generally unverifiable. Last, the special features listed on each of the DVDs is not relevant to an encyclopedia. We aren't Amazon.com. Unless there is something significant about the features, or the cuts (i.e. like with Blade Runner), then it shouldn't be mentioned.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)