User talk:144.92.29.39

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 144.92.29.39, is registered to University of Wisconsin Madison and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Emperor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Freak104, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] September 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:InnocuousPseudonym. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Cheers, Lights () 18:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Emperor. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 18:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:69.183.15.244, you will be blocked from editing. AngelOfSadness talk 18:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Serial killer, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, Lights () 18:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 3 days as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. WjBscribe 18:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

You just think I'm at UW because I'm such a good hack! You can't stop the REAL Napster! You'll never know where I really am!! 144.92.29.39 16:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Emperor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Freak104, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:InnocuousPseudonym. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Cheers, Lights () 18:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Emperor. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 18:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:69.183.15.244, you will be blocked from editing. AngelOfSadness talk 18:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Serial killer, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, Lights () 18:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 3 days as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. WjBscribe 18:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:Lights, you will be blocked from editing. AngelOfSadness talk 16:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block and action could be taken against the individual behind this IP address.

NawlinWiki 16:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for another month. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.Kukini hablame aqui 16:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Hackers (film), you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 16:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

NB:This activity seems to have continued at 144.92.29.40. (Emperor 17:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Shadow-X and pro-registration

Woohoo! I win! You people are so obsessed with reverting vandalism immediately you don't even check to see if it actually is vandalism. The edit I made to Shadow-X was a positive contribution to that page, but you reverted it because I hid it amongst a bunch of edits that were vandalism. Talk about bonehead! And did any of you notice the not-so-hidden message I sent with all of my edits to user pages? You should block all IP addresses from editing so that vandalism can be cut down significantly. Obviously people can create accounts to do vandalism, but it'll be a lot easier to stop them. All I have to do is renew my IP address here or move to another computer and I can continue to vandalize!! Wikipedia sucks. 144.92.29.39 16:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

See you back in another month. Perhaps you will choose to drop the childish games and just edit productively then. --Kukini hablame aqui 16:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Emperor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Ionescuac, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I'll be good. I promise! :-( Please give me another chance."


Decline reason: "This address has been blocked five times in the past six weeks or so. No longer any reason to assume the vandalism will end. — Yamla 16:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.