User talk:142.205.240.234
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, 142.205.240.234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
Contents |
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff aquilon
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --AllyUnion (talk) 11:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --NaconKantari 23:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User talk:Naconkantari
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Prodego talk 23:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the article User talk:142.205.240.234:
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Prodego talk 23:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Penis, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bikeable (talk) 20:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Star
Please refrain from inserting editorial comments in the Toronto Star article. There has been discussion and consensus on the talk page. Myciconia 19:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop. Take the time to view and understand the Wikipedia:Five_pillars. Myciconia 03:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Permeability (fluid)
Your recent edit to Permeability (fluid) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trio of Italians
Please don't remove neutrality tags without explanation, as you did to Trio Of Italians. If you disagree with the tag, please discuss on the article's talk page. SteveO 17:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gerald Hannon and William J. McCormick
Regarding Gerald Hannon, we are going to review this one more time:
- According to all existing sources, Claire Hoy's reports on the Body Politic controversy were published in the Toronto Sun, not the Toronto Star. If you're sure he was with the Star, then show some proof that all of the other sources are wrong. Wikipedia's goal is verifiability; even if something is factually wrong we have to back up the change with sources, and at this point all the sources on the Hannon controversy say he was with the Sun at the time.
- Not a single one of the arrested men in Project Guardian was found guilty on the child pornography charges. Several were found guilty of other offenses such as prostitution or drug possession, but there was no child pornography. You will not conflate the guilty verdicts with the non-existent child pornography; Wikipedia is required to be accurate and those are two separate issues.
- Wikipedia's WP:NPOV rule requires that we describe his work as what it is, and not as what some people think of him even if they've been factually and verifiably proven wrong. The article will not describe him as an endorser of pedophilia or even as a person "widely perceived" as one; it's a verifiable fact that he isn't one.
Regarding William J. McCormack: Again, Wikipedia's NPOV rule largely forbids a large part of the content you insist on reverting back into the article. Wikipedia articles are not permitted to report things as if one side of a dispute is clearly right and the other is clearly wrong (e.g. describing McCormick as perfect and the police services board or the provincial government as intransigent forces trying to interfere with the police). Wikipedia articles are not permitted to rely on unnamed sources; if you want to present McCormick's side of the corruption investigation, you must provide an actual published source showing the facts.
In both cases, your edits to the articles were and are inappropriate, and they stop now. Bearcat 01:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Khan
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.Kaisershatner 20:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Stefany Singh. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SMC 14:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
| | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |

