User talk:142.177.43.189

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Logan controversy

i removed it because it reeked of original research.

95% percent of the article seems to be just copy and pasted from the work of James Logan. By looking at the history of the article, it seems you've twice pasted over everything previous with Logan's words; Sept.2006 and seven months later in Apr.2007. BTW it doesn't matter who contributes to Wikipedia, its what you contribute. "Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Sources should be appropriate to the claims made: exceptional claims require exceptional sources."

I was talking about the bulk of the present Clan Logan article being J.Logan's text, not your controversy piece. I will put it back in the article for you, i am definitely not the boss, and do not want to argue about something like this and make it a bigger issue than it should be.