Talk:1:5:200
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to WikiProject Urban studies and planning, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale. |
You might be interested in: Hughes, W P, D Ancell, S Gruneberg, and L Hirst (2004) Exposing the myth of the 1:5:200 ratio relating initial cost, maintenance and staffing costs of office buildings Procs 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2004, Edinburgh, UK. Reading: ARCOM, I, 373-82.
http://www.personal.rdg.ac.uk/~kcshuwil/publish/arcom2004.pdf
this paper claims that 1:5:200 is more of a marketing buzz with few evidence from a scientific point of view
[edit] Missing
The article forgot to mention whether run cost is 200x build cost or 1/200th build cost —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tabby (talk • contribs) 01:06:48, August 19, 2007 (UTC).
