User talk:137.164.198.146

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 137.164.198.146, is registered to Corporation for Education Network Initiatives in California (CENIC) and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Contents

[edit] Warnings

[edit] May 2007

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Coral reef, you will be blocked from editing. —LOL 21:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Coral reef. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: reef&diff=next&oldid=132783012 link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. David Mestel(Talk) 21:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Coral reef. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. aJCfreak yAkBaK 21:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
  4. Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Prairie. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. aJCfreak yAkBaK 21:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
  5. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Friction, you will be blocked from editing. --barneca (talk) 18:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

  1. Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Karl Schwarzschild worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lisatwo 21:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to October 10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornix 21:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


Don't you have anything more constructive to do? Deleting pages or parts of pages can't possibly be that much fun. Please stop vandalizing pages, many people work very hard to create them. Beast of traal T C _ 21:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Beast of traal


[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Steinbeck. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Satori Son 22:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Squirrel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 18:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Squirrel constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Gurch 19:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC))

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 17:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Coal (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Coal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Old Moonraker (talk) 23:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Art, you will be blocked from editing. Clubmarx (talk) 05:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to British Airways Flight 38, you will be blocked from editing. Clubmarx (talk) 05:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Gold rush has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. The Helpful One (Talk) (Contribs) (Review) 18:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Black Irish has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. – Gurch 21:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Black Irish constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. – Gurch 21:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC))

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. shoeofdeath 21:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Black Irish (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 104 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 21:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 19:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Aircraft. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —αἰτίας discussion 16:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Aircraft. —αἰτίας discussion 16:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Hut 8.5 16:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kidney stone, you will be blocked from editing. VMS Mosaic (talk) 18:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Harry Houdini has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 19:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Houdini. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Harry Houdini was changed by 137.164.198.146 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-07T19:37:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sojourner Truth. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 21:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sojourner Truth. J.delanoygabsadds 21:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Justin(Gmail?)(u) 21:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Houdini, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf42 18:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Cambrian has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 18:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Debagging has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. MBisanz talk 20:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tank, you will be blocked from editing. Trekphiler (talk) 04:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nymphetamine, you will be blocked from editing. ≈ The Haunted Angel 19:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. seicer | talk | contribs 19:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nellie Bly has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 17:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Your recent edit to Tonsillectomy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 16:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)