User talk:134.233.132.6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --G3pro 16:39, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Contents

Direct descent from William I to Elizabeth II

The shortest link to William I is not the purpose of the list, it follows only the royal line (in this case the Lionel of Clarence line through Elizabeth of York). QEII must be at generation 32 to be consistent to the other lists in this article. I will wait for your changes before I make corrections, but I thought you might like to correct your efforts to be consistent with the list's purpose. Thanks for the editing :) NoSeptember talk 13:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

The Henry VII/Henry VIII discussion should be included, so I added it back. Thanks for bringing the idea up - the list needed some further explanation. NoSeptember talk 15:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

american-interrupted.com

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 14:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

American, Interrupted

Hi Jpgordon. The American, Interrupted listing may seem to be spamming, but it is in fact a reputable book and site. I have read the book and the links on other pages are simply because the website is so media-heavy. The multimedia site has so much non-traditional information on it, it is better if researchers browse on the american-interrupted.com website. For example, the video showing actual European war materials in Iraq. Although it has been written about, there is little photographic proof of it. Thompson's site provides video of it. When reading Thompson's blog, it becomes clear that he was present at many critical moments in the Iraq conflict. His journalistic style is impressive and the book/blog is an absolute resource for those researching Iraq. I would reconsider the assertion that the American, Interrupted listing is purely spam. I believe this book has great potential to be one of the best resources for historical information about Operation Iraqi Freedom. I also believe the website is a great resource for unique information about life in Iraq. There is one page on the website offering to sell the book, but there are many more other prominent links offering free video and information. We should support grass roots books like this, or risk falling on the wrong side of judgement when it finally goes mainstream. This is my personal belief, as someone affiliated with 1AD at a professional level.

Aug 3 edits

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Madchester 07:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Madchester 08:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during November 30, 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. CiTrusD 09:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Dr. Phil. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. amitch (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CiTrusD 09:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Phil McGraw, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalise Wikipedia once again, you will be blocked from editing.--Andrewrost3241981 21:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. TimVickers 21:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
. TimVickers 21:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

March 20th, 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Dawson, you will be blocked from editing. CopperMurdoch 10:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Racism

Your recent edit to Racism (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Myanw 15:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Nishkid64 15:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)