User talk:129.7.75.222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 129.7.75.222, is registered to University of Houston and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this IP address, University of Houston response team has requested that administrators consider a short duration soft block, and have stated that they will respond to reports sent to abuse@uh.edu , which may lead to disciplinary measures being taken by the school's administration.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rachel Corrie, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rachel Corrie was changed by 129.7.75.222 (u) (t) deleting 12795 characters on 2008-02-21T22:00:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Rachel Corrie, you will be blocked from editing. --MPerel 22:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rachel Corrie, you will be blocked from editing. --MPerel 22:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "original unblock reason"


Decline reason: "You have provided no reason to believe you weren't edit-warring or that you have read and understood WP:3RR. — Yamla (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

MPerel is clearly vandalizing, refusing to pay attention to the things which have been now proven 100% falsehoods which were sitting on that page. He refused to come to the talk page as well. His "report" was a clear fraud.

I now see the blocking person communicating and coordinating directly with mperel. I can only assume they are working together with this to control that article and push the falsehoods. For Details See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Acroterion#thank_you

And you were repeatedly blanking extensive parts of a sourced article with POV-pushing assertions, then reporting the editor who reverted the blankings to AIV. Acroterion (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Acroterion is obviously working with MPerel. Multiple people have reported the fraud and provided sourced evidence to the talk page and they are working to suppress this.

[edit] Fairlight (group)

Your edit summaries appear to be in violation of WP:Civil. Please use more civil and informative edit summaries in the future. Toddst1 (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)