User talk:124.120.185.66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Geoffrey Giuliano

If you are going to insist on continuing to remove sourced material from this article, would you at least discuss point by point what you are removing and why on the talk page? --Onorem 16:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Onorem. It appears that you're still following the wear-them-down approach. You think you can just keep deleting unfavorable material and, sooner or later, we'll give up and let you have your way. Well, you're wrong. I invite your attention to the Sollog article. Note its extensive history. Note the Talk:Sollog page, with its eight volumes of archives. Sollog thought he could wear us down. You see the result -- the article still describes his criminal record despite his best efforts. Your only hope of influencing the Giuliano article is to play by Wikipedia's rules -- cite sources, discuss changes on the talk page, etc. JamesMLane t c 23:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A way to proceed

Would it be acceptable to work on 1 or 2 paragraphs at a time on the talk page? I'll copy the text of the first couple paragraphs into a new section at the bottom of the talk page. When you have a chance, succinctly explain what you believe is wrong or missing from them and if you have any sources that could be used. Please keep your caps lock off on this step. If we do this in a somewhat organized manner, it shouldn't take very long to discuss our way through any changes that are needed. --Onorem 02:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Geoffrey Giuliano. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Goochelaar 13:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)