User talk:123.243.252.86

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Transit Officer

why?

Give this a read: Wikipedia:Verifiability - if you can dig up a newspaper article about it then it can stay, as long as it is reworded to meet Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view. Might want to tuck it in the proper station of the article (the one about uniform) rather than just chucking it in at the top as well. Wongm (talk) 10:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Newspaper article?
Dude... they wear the uniforms, on the trains! I'm assuming you've not seen it?
It's just the way things work here - just because you see or think something you can't just go writing about it. For some stuff you can get away with it, but for minor non controversial things. Notive the bit saying "current uniforms "too threatening" and "SWAT-like" " has a link to where it came from? Same goes here. Wongm (talk) 11:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Ditto. While I agree that the new uniforms might mean MoPs confuse Transits with police, it is too subjective a statement to put in an encyclopedia where we are striving for verifiability. Wait until the Daily Telegraph runs a piece - which I'm sure they will before too much longer - and then you can verify what you write. DirectEdge (talk) 23:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)