User talk:12.144.110.131

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Technology law

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Technology law, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Alvestrand 15:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Punta Cana:

Your recent edit to Punta Cana (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 16:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Potemkin village, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Potemkin village was changed by 12.144.110.131 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-01T22:14:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Potemkin village. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kuru talk 22:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Potemkin village, you will be blocked from editing. Kuru talk 22:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru talk 22:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war{{#if:| according to the reverts you have made on Argosy University. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Mysteryquest (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I regret to inform you that you have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 16:47, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please do not misrepresent the sources of information in articles, as you did in your recent edit to Argosy University. Your edit appeared to be vandalism and has been reverted. --Orlady (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Argosy University, you will be blocked from editing. --Orlady (talk) 13:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: [1]. Do not imply that other editors are not adults because you disagree with them. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mysteryquest (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)