User talk:121.1.45.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 121.1.45.2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 08:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Ran Online

Your recent edit to Ran Online (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Night Watch (2004 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 12:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. -Icewedge (talk) 01:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 01:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 17:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Official Roxas City Website

I believe this is the official LGU website: http://www.roxascity.gov.ph/ and not this: http://www.roxascityrealestates.com/. The ".gov.ph" domain says it all. It has not, contrary to your claim, "moved due to nonpayment to host". — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 17:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

That was the official site. We have been commissioned by the Tourism Department of the City to revamp their online campaign and exhibit the city in a better light. 38 programmers, web-developers, animators and art-directors both local and international were paid by the city government of Roxas City to build its new online home at http://www.roxascityrealestates.com. dot-Gov-dot-ph is a pseudo dot-Ph domain, it is in fact a private American-owned hosting company that has been monopolizing its rates and policies recently. Roxas City wants to opt-out of this monopolizing scenario and has made plans of transferring its domain early on before being manipulated unwittingly by American net industries. And please!! Was that site in your estimation befitting of the word "official"? "Kung kacheapan ang taste sang mga taga-Bacolod, indi ya pagpapareho-a ang Roxas City itsoy!" (If your local culture has less sophisticated taste, do not think that others would share the same, young man.) 121.1.45.2 (talk) 01:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Mariter Barrios Bermejo
Let us limit our discussion to what matters. Personal views and biases have no bearing here in Wikipedia. We advocate a neutral point of view. I am not interested in arguing the moot point of who is "cheap" or "cool". As a Wikipedian, I am merely interested in the facts and upholding the Wikipedian culture. You can't blame me for having the mindset that all LGU's have a ".gov.ph" domain. That is only logical. Do not take it as a personal affront when your edits got reverted, it happens all the time; you are not a registered user and simply use an anonymous IP – for all I knew your edits might be those of some pimply high school kid from who knows where. If you do register as a Wikipedia user, you'll have more credibility. But the main point is, communicate with the editors here in Wikipedia. If you objected to the reverts, you could have left a message in the article's talk page the first time, explaining your edits. Wikipedians always go by consensus. Even as an anon IP user you have that right to have your opinion heard. But we do it in a civil manner. Now that you have explained your edits, I'll let it stand. Isn't civility a beautiful thing? =) I have been to Roxas City, several times over the years, and have been impressed by the manners of the people I have interacted with in that city; cultured, polite and refined. Oh, one thing more – I am a Silaynon, and not from Bacolod. Cheers and happy editing! — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 08:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Kurt, a pimply high-school kid from who-knows where, have as much credibility to contribute and edit. Your biases betrays how much you evaluate and appraise things, which applies to all other aspects in your dealings: not only in this scenario but with how you easily dismiss and classify circumstances based on hasty prejudices and uncareful consideration. Using good judgment to consider likely consequences dictates that a thorough investigation and presumption of good faith (irregardless of class or looks or pimples or age) must be engendered before one acts accordingly. It's a pity, I find you cute pa naman. I know that's a personal comment, but i'm a very frank person. But yes I do. At age 37. Wow, you still look hot. Especially in that shot when you were in the hospital. I bet the nurses were giggling to give you a little massage. And lastly, never undersestimate pimply high-school kids. Especially kids. Geniuses and leaders can come from their ranks. You were once a kid. Never discredit adolescents and the youth. Adults who have no respect for them do not deserve any as well. "Unless ye become a child, like this, ye shall never enter the kingdom of heaven..." Smile. You look cuter that way. I hope you're not yet married. And i love calling you "Itsoy." So don't take that offensively. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.45.2 (talk) 10:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I never take offense on Wikipedia; otherwise I would have hid behind an anonymous username. The reason for that is simple; I am here to contribute, not to come into conflict with other people. However, the issue is not about me. I am a teacher; I am much aware of the youth's potential; I never underestimate them. Some are fountains of knowledge, the source of my pride as their mentor. Some, however, are capable of oh so evil creations. Just like adults. =) Hmmm... Maybe those WikiPilipinas people were right all along; there's no such thing as a completely neutral point of view. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 22:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
There is no such thing as complete neutrality. It's an ideal, but hardly close to anything physically possible...well, relative at least to human culture and social consciousness. Love, for one, is never neutral. And at the point of orgasm, the Self completely forgets everything and is solely preoccupied with enjoying that three-second moment of bliss. There is no such thing as neutrality. Humans would always make things personal. The sense of the Self and self-preservation would always be preeminent than any other communal and shared ethos and disciplines. Neutral or not, I think you're really attractive. Reminds me of Professor Lupin in J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter. Roughly handsome and ravenous in bed. Very sexy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.45.2 (talk) 05:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh well, you can't blame one for aspiring to achieve a higher plane of existence. Hmm... I wonder what your Patronus would be. =) — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 06:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)