Talk:0.999.../Archive index
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This report has been generated because of a request at Talk:0.999.... It covers the archives that match Talk:0.999.../Archive <#>
Report generated at 15:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC) by HBCAI
| Discussion Topic | Replies (estimated) | Archive Link |
|---|---|---|
| "every non-zero, terminating decimal has a twin with trailing 9s." (pedantry) | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| "Real analysis" followed by "Real numbers" | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| .999... = 1? | 8 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| 0.111....*9 | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| 0.999... < 1 ? | 47 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| 0.999... versus .999 repeating | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| 0.999 ≠ 1, but whole fractions work | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| 1.999... | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| 1/9 | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| 10x - x | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| A counterproof? | 13 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| A couple of suggestions for the end of the day | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| A few points to consider. | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| A number inbetween | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| A proof of the more general concept | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| A question about the FAQs | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| A quick question about the opening sentence. | 10 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| A Simpler Proof | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| A slight problem | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| A Solution we all can agree on? | 19 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| about math | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| About the above discussion | 11 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| Add 1/1 as notation for 1, 0.999... | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Adding the z-transform | 8 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 4 |
| Algebra Proof | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| Algebraic proof | 11 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Alternative algebraic proof | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Alternative proofs | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Ambiguous statement | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| An addition to the elementary proofs section: | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| An observation | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 3 |
| And now for something different: | 46 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| And the p-adics | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Another, albeit not a formal proof | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Another Picture | 8 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Another proof... Maybe? | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Another Proof | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Another rant | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Anyone who deletes this... | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Apples and bannas: not enough explanation in the concept | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| Archimedean property | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Archive 08 | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Archive 5 | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 6 |
| Article should give definition before proofs | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Back on the horse | 12 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Bad idea | 20 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Better explanation of base 2 and 3? | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Blah, blah, blah... | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| Bombardment | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| But what about 1=0.999...? | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Calc Thingy | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Call me crazy | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Capitalization of "Doppelgänger" | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Change to lead? | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Cogent objection? | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Comment | 12 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Concerning misconceptions | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Congratulations | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Congratulations | 16 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Contradictions and stupidities... | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 6 |
| Corbin's Proof | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Could/has someone figured out a fix for this | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Could .999... get plutoed one day? | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Creation of this entry | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Dedekind cut proof | 3 | Talk:0.999... |
| Definition of uniqueness? | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Disagree with merging to invalid proof | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| division by zero? | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Do Not Feed The Troll (and a comment) | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Does this matter? | 18 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Does this work with other repeating decimals? | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Dual numbers: not ordered? | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Dubious caveats | 13 | Talk:0.999... |
| Educational research in the introduction | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| EEK | 10 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 4 |
| Enough. | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| Entities and Unicode | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Error in logic in calculus and analysis section | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Exactly? | 14 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Expanding "Real analysis" | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Explanation for removal of good-faith insertion | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| factuality disputes | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Failed Logic | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| First paragraph | 8 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Formal vs. non-formal | Unknown | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Fractals | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Fraction proof | 14 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Geometric series proof | 75 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Good one | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Great Article | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Ha ha ha | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Has this article ever convinced anyone of anything? | 12 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Headache | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Here we go again! | 13 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| How about a conceptual "proof" by the Socratic method? | 8 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| How can it be a real number and a hyperreal? | 10 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| How I finally got a grasp on this. | 2 | Talk:0.999... |
| I Have a New Proof for why 0.999...=1 | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| I suggest some research on how the 0.999... confuses mathematicians | 10 | Talk:0.999... |
| I think a simpler proof | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| IEEE reals | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| If 0.999... does equal to 1 then i can prove that 0.99=1 by the same method | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| If 0.99999=1.... | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| If I may speak to the article itself... | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| Illustrations | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| image | 13 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Impressed! | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Inclusion of the fractional proof | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Infinite number of finite things | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Infinitesimals | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Infinitesimals | 18 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| infinity divided by infinity | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| INSANE! | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Intermediate proofs | 14 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Interwiki | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| intro | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| Intuitive counter-proof | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Is 0.999... even a number? | 15 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Is This an Encyclopedia Article? | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Is this an essay? | 13 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Keep in mind your knowledge of mathematics | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Lead section, again | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Lead section and popular culture | 8 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Levels of hypocrisy. | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| Major edit | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Mathematicians who think 0.999... and 1 are different numbers | 13 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| Melchoir and Anon Only Please! | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 3 |
| Merge proposal | 19 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 4 |
| Merger with recurring decimal | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Mind the following: | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| Minor Math Formatting | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| More Emphasis of the Cantor set and P-ary expansion | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| More emphasis on exact | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Move from Talk:Proof that 0.999... equals_1 | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Move request | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Move to "Multiple decimal representations" | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Moving along... | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| much simpler proof | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| My baby! | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| My reversal | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| New content | 10 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 4 |
| New section: Arguments against | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Nice | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| No!! | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| No, we're not going to do this merry dance. | 48 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 2 |
| Non-Zero Terminating Decimal | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Not true? | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Notation | 8 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Notes into two columns | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| One day's changes | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| OR problem? | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Ordering | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| original research | 51 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Other number systems | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Other numbers | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Oustanding article | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| People actually argue about this? | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Perhaps it's all a matter of notation | 9 | Talk:0.999... |
| Physical Reality | 21 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Picture | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Pictures | 12 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Pouplar Sport in Message Boards | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Practical use of .999... issue | 14 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Problem in the representation? | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Problematic attempt | 14 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Problems with 0.999.... | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Proof that 0.999... < 1 | 44 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| Proofs need to be reexamined | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Proposal to globally change inline mathematics into sans-serif | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Psychological issues? | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Question about the FAQ | 15 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Question to people | 9 | Talk:0.999... |
| Random question... | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Rasmus' proof and its error | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| Rasmus' proof in all its glory | 10 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| Rational numbers are sufficient for this subject | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Rationality of 0.999..... | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Real life Applications | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| real numbers | 12 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Recall | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 3 |
| Refutation of Counterarguments in the Introduction: Confusing? | 6 | Talk:0.999... |
| Removal of POV tag | 15 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Requested move | 33 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| Reverting | 25 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 9 |
| rewrite | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Rules of engagement | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| Rv "real number" back to "quantity" | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Same discussion on other sites | 13 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 3 |
| See also | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Set Question | 17 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Show your work | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Significance | Unknown | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Significance | Unknown | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Simiplification | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Simple but effective | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Simple Proof | Unknown | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Simple proofs | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Skepticism in education | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Spoken Article | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Step 2??? | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Student stories | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Subpages | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Subtraction proof | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Suggested Removal as a Featured Article | 30 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Suggesting for introduction | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Suggestion | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| Suggestion regarding .000...1 | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Table | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Take it from the top, shall we? | 13 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| Talk Page Maintenance | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Terminating expansion "almost always" preferred? | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| The Conclusion | 11 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 6 |
| The crux of the matter: | 12 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 3 |
| The debate resumes - Problems with Rasmus's Proof | 29 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| The disagreement of Santa Claus | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 1 |
| The most irrelevant FA ever | 23 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| The problem is in the reals set | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| The real conclusion | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| The reason for the confusion | 8 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| The validity of various proofs | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| The whole definitions problem | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| The world would be a better place | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| There should be a POV tag | 54 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| This article could be better | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| This doesn't seem very NPOV | 17 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| This is a really good article | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| This is not a good way to test students intuïtive knowledge about mathematics. | 11 | Talk:0.999... |
| This is the best we can come up with? | 14 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| This page should redirect to 1(number) | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| this seems to cause a paradox | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| This sounds weird | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Thought on the discussion | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Time for a comment? | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 11 |
| Time to trim the fat at the math faculties | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Title | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Title Change | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Tone? | 9 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| trivial question... | 6 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Trivial trivia about the linked joke | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Unecessarily long references section | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Unencyclopedic article:liable for deletion | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 7 |
| Updated the introduction | 11 | Talk:0.999... |
| Use of ellipses | 14 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 6 |
| Wait, if the formula is true... | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| We should try to define it better | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Well done | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| well it isnt equal but frightening near | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| What a tragedy! | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| What about the Heaviside Step function? | 3 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| What is wrong with the joke? | 25 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| What is wrong with this discussion? | 25 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 5 |
| what this means for other numbers | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Wheeee! | 26 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 4 |
| where are the sources | 2 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Where we go wrong | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Who the hell fucked up the featured article | Unknown | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Why "exactly equal" - the expression | 7 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Why this article is nonsense. | 24 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 6 |
| Why this article is so hard to get right | 21 | Talk:0.999... |
| Why this equality is so hard to prove | 27 | Talk:0.999... |
| Wikify tag | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 8 |
| Woah: | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Would this be in Applications? | 5 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Wow. Thank you. | 4 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
| Yet another proof of 1 = 0.999... | 10 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| Yet another proof variant | 12 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 12 |
| your loophole | 1 | Talk:0.999.../Archive 10 |
