User talk:01rayws

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion of Abberley and Malvern Hills Geopark

A tag has been placed on Abberley and Malvern Hills Geopark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pnswmr (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fordhall Farm

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fordhall Farm, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.seekitout.co.uk/item.php?id=11. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability

If I took a severe view I could speedily delete the article on the strength of this AfD discussion but I am feeling kind. However you do need to work hard on it to establish its notabilty. The 2006 version was little better than yours - I can let you have a copy of it is you set up an e-mail address! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Fordhall Farm has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Fordhall Farm constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Fordhall Farm. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Mdebets (talk) 19:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)