User talk:Šarukinu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Shlama

Ayet Atooraya ewet? Chaldean 00:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Shlama akhoun. Yes, ana ewin Ashuraya.Šarukinu 21:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Ham ana. Ana-wen birya gou Baghdad bas nashwathee-la min Araden. Y`eshin daha qourba l'Detroit gou Rochester. Zweena'n kthawa d'Soureth ou bayen kathwen kha alephbeth b'Latin tla kthawa b'Soureth makh d'eeleh weetha Mustapha Kemal Ataturk tla Turkayeh b'leeshaneh'en.סרגון יוחנא 20:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Assur

Khon, here is a report from the United Nations World Heritage Site website; [[1]] Chaldean 18:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[[2]] - first temple of Ashur is built (c. 4750 B.C.) Chaldean 01:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ashurbanipal

You're certainly correct about that stela, I took it myself from another part of Wiki and placed it in that article. I've already moved the picture of the statue my question was about, it can still be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ashurbanipal.jpg Greetings, Djaser 20:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] When was the word Assyria first used after the fall of their dynasty

You know that the Assyrian dynasty was destroyed and it's people were forced to flee, what happened to Assyrians and Assyria, when was the first time the term Assyria or assyrian was used after the fall of their dynasty. It is no data about what happened to the Assyrians nor Assyria, dont you think that it's weird that so many people dissapear for such a long period and then suddenly just come back

Asm ccc 11:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chaldean

The Chaldean people are a different people from Assyrians. There is no proof in the pudding to say that most Chaldeans are ethnically Assyrian. If there is any proof I would like to see and I would like it to be sourced. Secondly, the bias opinion of the Assyrian people is spreading false facts across to the wider audience interested in reading the articles which are put on wikipedia. Hence, there not put on Wikipedia to form a biased one sided view but are put on Wikipedia as factual information to help others gain better understanding. The bias counterpoints and spreads irrelevant information. Thirdly, the Saint Sultana Mahdokh is not an Assyrian Saint. Let me point out why. The story of St. Sultana Mahdokh is very interesting and allows us to further gain an insight into the Chaldean/Assyrian Era. St. Sultana Mahdokh, a Chaldean saint spoke to a Kurdish man which was walking down the alleys in which thew church is now built. She asked him whilst he was sleeping after pastering his lamb to build her a church where ever the lamb stops. He woke up and disobeyed and did not do it. The second day, she said the same thing and said that there will be a consequence if he doesn't build her the church. So the lamb stopped, and the Kurdish man built the church. The church being so old; 325 AD shows that the Chaldean people where around at that time, in Araden. How do we know this? Well the church being in a Chaldean town, in which Chaldeans worshipped and prayed there proves this. Chaldean Catholicism has always been the key religion there. So then how can Chaldeans MYSTERIOUSLY turn to become Assyrians? Im sorry, but the arguments that are being put forward by the Assyrian people are like a souffle firm on the outside but only hot air inside.

Andrew.Hermiz 6:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Nothing to comment on??? Lost for words???

Andrew.Hermiz 10:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Haha. Read my lengthy post on your own page Andrew, then come back and ask me if I'm lost for words :) Šarukinu 17:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Andrew Hermiz why are you blanking your page. I am Aradnaya, we are Assyrian. The village belonged to the Church of the East before the 18th Century. My uncle is a priest in the Chaldean Church and I have an aunt that's a nun. You must be 12 years old? Sargon

Guys please dont waist your time with people like these. They just like to play games. I suggest you all just to work on articles and forget these kids who claim to be professors at Universities :D Chaldean 18:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

You're right Chaldean, but somebody has to educate them. ;) Šarukinu 00:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

To begin with, Sarukinu I have been to my page and have found not lengthy post on my page.. so maybe you should go back and check before you tell me that you have written something. Secondly, I am not under the impression that there is any proof behind lets say the "Bias" fact that the village of Araden belonged to the Church of the East. If it did can I please have proof not just comments stated by you. Thirdly, Chaldean (the user) I would like you to change your username as you are lieing by saying you are chaldean when there was proof found on a talk page that you are aturaya. If you have to sink that low to ruin the Chaldean name I don't know what type of a person you are. I also did not claim to be a professor at any university so maybe before you state things like that you should open your eyes, read and then state comments. Finally, Sarukinu I believe I am very well educated and don't need people like you to educate me. Afterall all I will be receiving is bias opinions and POV's. Maybe before you people actually write a comment it will be good to read and then take note of what has been said before making up lies as you go.

Andrew.Hermiz 5:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Haha, nice job deleting my post Andrew, too bad it shows up in your history. I'm not going to bother with you - just read the history of the Church of the East and Northern Mesopotamia - Araden did not always "belong" to the Chaldean Catholic Church, because it didn't exist 1700 years ago, khoun. I don't know why you're so hostile towards your own brothers and sisters, but leave your political opinions out of Wikipedia.Šarukinu 15:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I can't stop laughing :D Chaldean 21:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Iwardo

Thanks for your comment, and my apologies for not discussing my edit. You might think that "Syriacs" is not very academic --I disagree, by the way--, but "Assyrian" certainly isn't. And you probably know that "Assyrian" is not generally accepted among the Suryoye. It is a political term, not scientific one.

Syriacs is merely an English rendering of Suryoye. --Benne ['bɛnə] _(talk) 15:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I am NOT arguing against the Assyrian Identity at all... it's quite the opposite.

I'm trying to state that we are all one people despite the hundred names.The Tsar is Gone but I am King 18:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I completely agree with you. :)Šarukinu 00:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sennacherib siege lachish.jpg listed for deletion

[edit] Shlama

Shlama khon. I am not very familier with him, but I think User:Stbalbach is. It is a great idea of what you proposed, but I think we should create a new page titled History of the Assyrians (like History of the Kurds) where we talk about all this, since the Assyrian people page will/is getting too long. Chaldean 04:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, listed on Wikiproject Assyria. Take charge! That project is just as much your as is mines. Chaldean 04:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Very nice khon. Will add whatever I can to the article. Chaldean 04:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok khon, the first thing we need to do I think is summeraize Akkad in the page. Chaldean 15:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Khon, the edits competly changed the beginning of the article. Wikipedians have agreed to have all ethnic groups to have some sort of guidelines, including a consistant starting sentence; like Armenians, Georgians, etc. And to begin the article with a statement like an identity connected to the ancient Assyrian Empire. While the Assyrian claim on this ancestry is largely correct, many other Iraqis also share the same origin. is totally out of wack. You say these kind of things leter on in the article, not in the beginning. Pshena. Chaldean 23:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Khon, I didn't do nothing with that, I just pressed enter to make it its own paragraph. Chaldean 23:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi you wanted to disscus the Western Syriacs? --WestAssyrian (talk) 12:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sargon of Akkad

is now an FAC. Given your participation in the Assyrian wikiProject I thought you might be interested. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 15:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Assyrian cuisine

What do you think of the update? Sharru Kinnu III 15:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Cousin, I like how you wrote khartimaneh in Syriac on the cuisine page. Could you possibly do that with the other foods too that I italicized using latin script to dictate Syriac? Sharru Kinnu III

[edit] Shlamaloukh

Hey there, I saw ur name in the Assyrian History article and thought I might say Hi, seeing that you are a fellow Assyrian. Yeah theres not much of us out there, but its great theres quite a few even in Wikipedia. I hope in the future yourself and I can improve these articles relating to ourselves.

Regards,

Tourskin 07:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shlama

Hi Sarukinu, Yes i have allready had a discussion with him about thoosetwo pictures he changed, I will vote thanks. Nochi 08:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

Hey fellow Mesopotamian, just checkin out ur page. BTW, if u need me to lend a hand in particular just tell me.Tourskin 03:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Funny you mentioned the "Assyrian People" article - I saw that there were lots of edits and thought I could lend a hand or something or an opinion. Anyways khoun (I say khouny), bkhesenoukh (I'll see you)! I know you know surid but maybe we use english letters differently! Lol!Tourskin 05:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Shlama khouny, (i was gonna carry on in saurid but it would have been embarassing!). Thank you for your suggestion. You are free to improve it in any way you see fit. Of course youc an edit it! You do not need my permission, but I greatly appreciate your politeness.

I will see you around!

Regards,

Tourskin 16:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tyaraye Tribe

Shlama Sargon, I need some help expanding this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EliasAlucard (talk • contribs) 19:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yo!

Hey Šarukinu, nice to see you back. Are you going to be more active or is this just temporary? — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 19:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] the Syriac nomenclature conundrum

Regarding your edit summary, "Aramaeans" [...] is [... a] subgroup: It is my understanding that "Aramaeans" is a term used by a subgroup for the entire Assyrian/Syriac group. I would be grateful if you could point out some source to the contrary if I am mistaken. Which 'subgroup', in your opinion, does "Aramaean" refer to? You will note that e.g. fr:Araméens ostensibly refers to the same (entire) group we discuss at Assyrian people. What part of the populations listed at Assyrian people (the "3.3 to 4.3 million" individuals dispersed over so many countries) does, in your opinion, the "Aramaean subgroup" include (ideally state the sources you base your analysis on)? dab (𒁳) 16:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I have replied on my talkpage. dab (𒁳) 17:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Guidelines

Please raise your thoughts on Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac)#Setting_rules.2Fguidelines. Chaldean (talk) 04:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)