From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Chemicals (Rated B-Class) |
 |
(-)-2β-Carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. |
 |
This article is also supported by WikiProject Chemistry. |
| B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
|
I suppose ß (German esszet) should be β (Greek beta)?
- Yes. I've corrected it now. Thanks for catching it. --Ed (Edgar181) 18:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Is the "Chemical Properties" section necessary?
I feel the chemical properties section, though helpful, adds clutter, lack of direction, and repetition to the page. I think some (or all) of the information should be added to the chart on the far right to help conform to the "typical Wiki article". CAS number, molecular formula, IUPAC name, and molecular weight are present in the chart already, leaving SMILES which can go under "Identifiers" in the chart, melting point and optical rotation which both can be put in "Chemical data", however the latter may or may not be important enough to be included. I'm not sure how to edit/add the chart, but if there is no objection, or change I will try myself. This article can be improved a lot more, such as replacing the "Chemical Properties" section with a "Chemistry" section discussing the structure, analogues, etc. that are mentioned under "Uses" which could also be re-titled "Pharmacology", "Medical Research", "Medicinal Use", or something such for the addition of clarity. Just a few thoughts.--Astavats (talk) 10:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
