Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thorvald Løndal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mackensen (talk) 03:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thorvald Løndal

De-prodded by article creator, this painter is not notable. 64 Google hits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punkmorten (talk • contribs)

This has been listed on WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Visual_arts Tyrenius 02:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Steel 18:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Very Weak Keep seems to be a pretty minor figure, but he's verifiable and we don't have many Danish artists. Dlyons493 Talk 20:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 20:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Ste4k 22:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete everything I can find on the painter on the internet leads me to conclude that he was and is a very minor artist indeed, a painting of his on sale for just €164 (frame included), is perhaps the most revealing evidence. --Eivind^t@c 23:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Copyvio and marked as such. However, notwithstanding that, I have to go for delete, even though I am sympathetic to Dlyons493 argument. Had their been some evidence of achievement and wider reputation, he could have been kept, but there doesn't seem to be any. Tyrenius 02:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.