Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninda Randhawa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 02:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ninda Randhawa

Ninda Randhawa (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nonnotable biography. Her representative has emailed the oversight list to state that she doesn't want the article and I cannot see any reason to refuse the request to delete. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 13:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:BIO Jeepday (talk) 13:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No sources. Not a good thing for a BLP. Not notable as written and unlikely will be able to be an encyclopedic and well balanced Wikipedia article. So yes, delete ASAP. FloNight 14:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Not sufficiently notable as written, per Flo. Bucketsofg 14:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination and WP:BIO. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 18:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no sources, no particular claim to notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete please. Both Ms Randhawa and I agree about the 'not notable enough' policy. As Ms Randhawa's representative here, I would also like to point out she would prefer it to be removed asap. She did not give permission for this data to be made publicly available. Thanks everyone. Lesley b linux 09:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete; most google results are wikipedia or mirrors[1]. John Vandenberg 13:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.