Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eskimo Bob (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as failing WP:WEB. Yomanganitalk 23:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eskimo Bob

Not notable. Does not comply with WP:WEB. Simonkoldyk 18:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment Should also include Eskimo Bob characters in this AfD as well. --141.156.232.179 22:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete A7. I slapped {{db-web}} tags on both pages; I don't think {{db-web}} existed yet when this nomination was made. hopefully an admin will just nuke both articles. --Aaron 23:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
    • I blammed one, but not this main article. I really hate this argument but Eskimo Bob actually had a fairly large internet following. I'll look up stats when I'm less busy. Yanksox 02:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete As usual for this type of article, no reliable sources, etc. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Simonkoldyk 18:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Alexa ranking of 1,782,948. Definitely fails WP:WEB. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 20:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - has had a large internet following in the past, goes on and off. it's in a bit of a lull now but this article has been active for well over a year now, it just needs a bit of work Cancellorian 01:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
An active article dosen't mean we keep it on wikipedia. If it has a big enough fan base it should be able to pass WP:WEB. --Simonkoldyk 03:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.