Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argyle Park
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Argyle Park
non notable christian rock band. does not meet WP:BAND, WP:A, ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 18:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, bundled with Misguided (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) and Suspension of Disbelief (Argyle Park album) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for non-notability. The band only played one live show. Bobanny 19:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Was signed to important indie record label Tooth & Nail whose record Define the Great Line hit Gold status and debuted at #1 on the mainstream charts. Xcryoftheafflictedx 03:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. One of the lower benchmarks on WP:MUSIC is that the band have released two or more albums on a major or significant indie label. With only one album on a notable indie label and one live show, there does not appear to be justification for an article, let alone three articles and a category.--Kubigula (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I was unfamiliar with the band until I did some searching. Argyle Park has articles on All Music Guide [1], Yahoo [2], and WindowsMedia.com [3]. The three combine to meet the central criteria " subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable". One release on major indie label. There are several fan websites. Royalbroil T : C 20:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment - The Yahoo and WM bios are copies of the Allmusic profile, which is itself derived from a band press release. You might have an argument that this is one published source, but I don't think it amounts to multiple sources. If the short bio were more of an actual review, I might agree as to notability when combined with the indie label album. However, I think it's all still too thin, especially when combined with the fact that they only ever played one live show.--Kubigula (talk) 21:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have added another reliable source. Dan, the CowMan 03:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - This article now meets "multiple non-trivial works" and points 4 and 5 of WP:MUSIC. Dan, the CowMan 03:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep per the Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music source added by Dan, the CowMan. -- Black Falcon 22:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

