Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert G. Mackey Award

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, the award on itself doesn't seem to be notable, and the society awarding it had its article deleted earlier. The biographical information could be merged to Albert Mackey, but I can't verify it and there are no sources in this article concerning it. - Bobet 21:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Albert G. Mackey Award

This is an nn award with only a five-year history, no list of recipients, and the part of the article that is actually about the award and not the person it was named after is only a stub, sourced to a few lines in one publication. MSJapan 14:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 17:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I am not in a position to say whether it is notable enough to merge into Scottish Rite but the editors of that article can decide if they want to incorporate it. BlueValour 17:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Will (message me!) 08:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It looks to be a fairly serious award given for having relevant material published. However, at this point I think it would be better suited to have the article renamed Albert G. Mackey as a bio with a subsection on the award. 205.157.110.11 10:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not significant enough at this time.ALR 01:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete If the society that created the award isnt notable enough for an article, why would one of its awards be notable? Resolute 04:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete. This article is mix of a bio on the person and simply lists the two adwards. The group that makes the adwards is a red link. Notablity is a question here. If there was an article on Mackey and the group that gives the awards and a statement about why the awards are encylopedic I'd clearly be voting keep. Vegaswikian 20:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Resolute. --Cheesehead 1980 13:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.